The figures reported here are based on an analysis of 40 reports considered to
demonstrate myocardial infarction or ischaemia, in the first 4000 AIMS
anaesthesia incidents.
It was judged that correct use of the algorithm would
have led to appropriate management in 90% of the reported cases, and would
actually have led to earlier recognition of the problem and/or better management
in 47% of the cases. The remaining 10% would have required the use of other
sub-algorithms (e.g. air embolism).
(1) In all cases, ECG changes were reported as the means of detection. The
diagnosis should be confirmed where possible by comparing monitor changes to a
pre-operative trace.
In 73% of cases there were associated cardiorespiratory abnormalities:
43% -
hypotension;
25% - tachycardia/hypertension;
5% - desaturation.
(2) 15% of cases were judged secondary to light anaesthesia and 50% of these
occurred with intubation.
(3) Resolution of ischaemia followed correction of cardiorespiratory
abnormalities alone in 35% of cases.
(4) In the incidents reported, it was considered that in 40% of cases coronary
vasodilator treatment, or more rapid treatment was indicated.
(5) It is well recognised that Standard 3 lead monitoring for ischaemia is very
insensitive. Use the CM5 configuration to maximise the detection of ischaemia if
multi-lead monitoring is not in use.
(6) Esmolol, a
β-blocker with a rapid onset and a short duration
of action, in a dose of 0.25 - 0.5 mg/kg IV, may be a suitable choice if
available. Otherwise use atenolol 0.015 mg/kg as a slow IV bolus.